Register
Bind every agent to a verified human owner and define its identity.
Rule47 gives every agent a verified identity, an approved purpose and limits it cannot break. Consequential actions get a verdict before they run. And when an agent fails, drifts or must be stopped, you stay in control.
How it works
Bind every agent to a verified human owner and define its identity.
Set its purpose, approved tools, spending caps, and data access scope in plain language.
Every action gets a verdict before it runs. Every verdict becomes auditable evidence.
Why now
78%
of organisations have no policy for creating or removing AI agent identities
Source: Cloud Security Alliance and Oasis Security, The State of Non-Human Identity and AI Security, January 202680%
of unauthorised agent transactions through 2028 will be internal policy violations, not external attacks
Source: Gartner, Market Guide for Guardian Agents, 202551%
of organisations have no clear ownership over their AI agents
Source: Cloud Security Alliance and Oasis Security, The State of Non-Human Identity and AI Security, January 2026Only 34%
apply the same security controls to AI agents as to human workers
Source: Okta, AI Agents at Work 2026: Securing the agentic enterprise4 layers of agent control
Rule47 binds every governed agent to a verified identity, approved purpose, enforced limits and runtime control.
Every agent gets a verified, unique identity bound to a named human owner. No anonymous agents operate in your systems.
An approved scope of work in plain language. The agent carries its approved purpose: it knows what it may do, what it must refuse and when it needs a human.
Approved tools, targets, spending caps, data access scopes. Limits are enforced at runtime, not as guidance in a PDF.
Consequential actions routed through Rule47 get one of four verdicts: ALLOW, ASK HUMAN, BLOCK or PAUSE AGENT. Every decision becomes evidence.
Seven controls
Seven non-negotiable controls for any AI agent in production.
The four verdicts
The reason is written in plain language. Your team and your auditor read the same thing.
Inside purpose, rights and limits. The action runs.
Over the limit or something changed. A person decides.
Outside the approved purpose or scope. The action never runs.
The agent was changed without approval. It stops itself.
Resilience & continuity
Blocking dangerous actions is the baseline. Rule47 is designed to keep your operation in control when agents fail, drift, are compromised or must be stopped.
Its identity, pending approvals and decision history stay intact. Work resumes or hands over cleanly instead of vanishing into a log file.
Behavioral signals watch for purpose deviation, unusual volume and repeated denials. Rising risk tightens the agent's room to act before something breaks.
A changed or tampered agent pauses itself and loses its trusted status until a named owner re-approves it. Isolation first, investigation second, restore last.
One guarded control pauses an agent, a team or a swarm. From that moment, consequential actions get ASK HUMAN or BLOCK until you release it.
On demand or automatically, Rule47 hands control to a named person following your BCM procedures. The link between agent and human successor is created when you need it, and the human can overtake the agent's actions at any point.
Agents are self-aware of their standing: each one carries its live risk, trust and permission state and tightens its own behavior as risk rises, before any human has to intervene.
How it's different
Your identity provider establishes who the agent is. Rule47 determines whether this specific action is permitted within its approved purpose.
Other tools list your agents and replay what happened. Rule47 decides whether the action happens at all.
The agent carries its own rules internally. Identity, purpose, and limits travel with the agent, not only in an external policy document. Defense in depth for agent governance.
Built in Hamburg, Germany. Designed for EU AI Act, GDPR and data sovereignty from day one. Not a US product with a European region.
Illustrative prototype workflow
Trigger
Schedule
Weekdays 07:00
Agent
Invoice Agent
Rule47 check
Identity · Limit
ALLOW
Action
Send payment
ERP · SAP
Designed to integrate with
Orchestration
Identity
Agents
Built for DORA regulated finance
DORA requires financial institutions to govern ICT risk from third parties, including AI agents. Rule47 produces the evidence your regulator needs under Article 6 (ICT risk management) and Article 28 (third party monitoring), continuously, not after an auditor asks.
Compliance
Article 50 transparency duties of the EU AI Act are live since 2 August 2026. High-risk system obligations arrive in December 2027. And the AI Act is only one of them: GDPR, ISO standards, SOC 2 and internal AI policies all demand the same thing. Rule47 produces the evidence each of them asks for, while your agents work, not after an auditor asks.
A named person approves scope and decides on every held action. (Art. 14)
Purpose and limits are versioned. Unapproved changes pause the agent. (Art. 9)
Complete, exportable record of every decision and approval. (Art. 12, 50)
Agent profiles stay current as living system records, not static PDFs. (Art. 11)
Beyond the AI Act
Purpose limitation, data minimisation and a records trail for every automated decision. (Art. 5, 22, 30)
Agent inventories, approved purpose and versioned controls map to AI management system requirements.
Access control, change detection and logging aligned to information security management controls.
Decision records and approval evidence map to security, availability and processing integrity criteria.
Identity, evaluation and governance of agents support the Govern, Map, Measure and Manage functions.
Built and hosted in Germany. Agent data stays in the EU under your control.
Fifteen minutes with your own agentic workflow. Enterprise pilot places and partnerships are open now.